The cover of this weeks Sports Illustrated Olympic preview features American downhill skier Lindsey Vonn in a familiar tuck position. Some are questioning the ‘exaggerated’ pose and that it is ‘sexually suggestive’? We think not. What do you think?

  1. papadick answered: Hell yeah! And its awesome!
  2. snyderly answered: I think “Americans” are overwhelming concerned with sexual innuendo and finding it where it’s not. And creating it. And enjoying it.
  3. chewedup answered: Not at all!
  4. pinsight reblogged this from thetickr
  5. slkscrn answered: People get way to offended now-a-days. This is not sexual at all.
  6. humblethorn answered: Sports Illustrated print something sexually suggestive? Surely not, those swimsuit editions are all sold for the articles.
  7. chestercopperpipes answered: shwing
  8. petite-kopine answered: I agree that it’s not “sexually suggestive” and I think that even suggesting that this innuendo exists is demeaning to the women and men.
  9. summic answered: i dont know
  10. fallenleafs answered: I don’t think the image is terrible, but it is rather indicative of how SI treats female athletes for their covers: this isn’t an action shot
  11. addahline answered: i think its more in her grin.
  12. apdoran answered: Give me a break! She is doing a photo shoot for SI! Not Playboy
  13. thetickr posted this